![]() ![]() Instead, one would acquire the lock only for the purpose of accessing the shared resource. For example, one would normally not write code that acquires a lock, then loads half a megabyte of zip-compressed data from the network, decodes and parses the data, and finally modifies a shared reference (append data to a container, etc.) before releasing the lock. The one important difference is how the different approaches behave in presence of congestion.Ī well-designed system normally has low or no congestion (this means not all threads try to acquire the lock at the exact same time). It is a common misconception that spinlocks or lock-free algorithms are "generally faster", or that they are only useful for "very short tasks" (ideally, no synchronization object should be held for longer than absolutely necessary, ever). How they behave in presence of congestion This may of course mean that a few milliseconds pass before your thread is scheduled again, but if this is no problem (usually it isn't) then it can be a very efficient, CPU-conservative approach.ģ. If a semaphore cannot be acquired, it blocks, giving up CPU time to a different thread that is ready to run. Also, for realtime applications it may not be acceptable to block and wait for the scheduler to come back to them at some far away time in the future.Ī semaphore, by contrast, either does not spin at all, or only spins for a very short time (as an optimization to avoid the syscall overhead). The main incentive for such an approach is the fact that a context switch has an overhead equivalent to spinning a few hundred (or maybe thousand) times, so if a lock can be acquired by burning a few cycles spinning, this may overall very well be more efficient. This means that acquiring a spinlock is a "busy" operation that possibly burns CPU cycles for a long time (maybe forever!) while it effectively achieves "nothing". It works by repeatedly querying and/or modifying a memory location, usually in an atomic manner. Insofar, one can consider a lock a special case of a semaphore with a maximum value of 1.Īs stated above, a spinlock is a lock, and therefore a mutual exclusion (strictly 1 to 1) mechanism. Usually, this means code that modifies some data shared by several threads.Ī semaphore has a counter and will allow itself being acquired by one or several threads, depending on what value you post to it, and (in some implementations) depending on what its maximum allowable value is. Usually, but not necessarily, spinlocks are only valid within one process whereas semaphores can be used to synchronize between different processes, too.Ī lock works for mutual exclusion, that is one thread at a time can acquire the lock and proceed with a "critical section" of code. A semaphore is a generalization of a lock (or, the other way around, a lock is a special case of a semaphore). See User Agreement for details.Spinlock and semaphore differ mainly in four things:Ī spinlock is one possible implementation of a lock, namely one that is implemented by busy waiting ("spinning"). Such communications and work product are private and confidential. Notwithstanding the above, using this IS does not constitute consent to PM, LE or CI investigative searching or monitoring of the content of privileged communications, or work product, related to personal representation or services by attorneys, psychotherapists, or clergy, and their assistants.This IS includes security measures (e.g., authentication and access controls) to protect USG interests-not for your personal benefit or privacy.Communications using, or data stored on, this IS are not private, are subject to routine monitoring, interception, and search, and may be disclosed or used for any USG-authorized purpose.At any time, the USG may inspect and seize data stored on this IS.The USG routinely intercepts and monitors communications on this IS for purposes including, but not limited to, penetration testing, COMSEC monitoring, network operations and defense, personnel misconduct (PM), law enforcement (LE), and counterintelligence (CI) investigations.By using this IS (which includes any device attached to this IS), you consent to the following conditions: Government (USG) Information System (IS) that is provided for USG-authorized use only. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |